Dr.
Narayan Pd Upadhyaya, Rosha Raut, Nirita
Giri
Kathmandu
valley is believed to be a lake in pre historic
period. According to folklore, a monk named
Manjushree came for meditation in the valley
and made an outlet by splitting a hill to
drain out the water from the valley. After
this the valley became suitable for human
settlement and the civilization started
in Kathmandu. During that time, water was
plentiful but with increase in population,
the available water became insufficient
and people started to search new sources
by constructing well and stone spout. With
time as the city grew, people faced the
shortage of water' the river water was deteriorating
due to haphazard urbanization and industrialization
and the volume of required water was increasing.
In addition the sealing of ground by buildings
and roads decreased the ground water level
consequently drying up the stone spouts,
once a major source for water. As a result
water from different sources such as rivers,
springs etc were piped into the valley from
periphery areas such as Sundarijal, Budhanilkantha,
Dudhkhola while some people extracted water
from deeper ground.
The current pipe water supply demand in
Kathmandu valley is about 150MLD but the
combined supply from ground and surface
water in dry season varies between 65 and
85 MLD. As the surface water yield is crucial
during the dry season, a policy of conjunctive
use of ground and surface sources has been
implemented. On an average the contribution
of the ground water remains close to 50%
of the total supply.
Ground
water is an important source of water for
the inhabitants of the Kathmandu valley
as majority of the residents depends on
this source. Ground water is usually less
contaminated than surface water. Leachate
from agriculture field, underground sewage
storage tanks, landfills, abandoned hazardous
wastes, industrial wastes storage lagoons
etc. located above or near aquifers usually
the cause of ground water contamination.
Once ground water becomes contaminated,
cleansing itself from degradable wastes
as surface water is almost impossible. Ground
water flow is slow and non-turbulent thus
contaminants are not effectively diluted
and dispersed. Furthermore, Ground water
has only small population of decomposing
bacteria than surface water systems reducing
rate of purification.
Objectives
The main objective of the study is to know
the ground water quality of Kathmandu valley.
Hence, only some major parameters like Ammonia,
Iron, Nitrate, and Manganese were selected
to know whether the water quality is suitable
for the domestic use or not.
Area
of study
Kathmandu valley representing the cities
of Kathmandu, Bhaktapur and Lalitpur is
the study area. Altogether 95 ground water
samples were analyzed from various points
of the Kathmandu valley during the year
2003. The sampling sites were selected randomly
from different public and private ground
water sources viz. tube well, dug well,
deep boring.
Results
& Discussion
The analyzed results of different parameters
have been compared with WHO guideline values
for drinking water. The percentage of ground
water sources having the concentration of
ammonia, nitrate, iron and manganese greater
than WHO GV for drinking water at the time
of analysis are shown in the table below.
|
Kathmandu |
Lalitpur |
Bhaktapur |
| 70 |
19 |
6 |
|
Percentage
contaminated |
NH3 |
52.86 |
47.37 |
83.33 |
| NO3 |
11.43 |
31.58 |
16.67 |
Fe |
65.71 |
47.37 |
50.00 |
Mn |
24.29 |
31.58 |
23.33 |
Maximum values of NH3, NO3, Fe and Mn found
in Kathmandu, Lalitpur and Bhaktapur are
represented in the table and graph as follows:
| |
NH3
(mg/L) |
NO3
(mg/L) |
Fe
(mg/L) |
Mn
(mg/L) |
Kathmandu |
37.41 |
108.8 |
26 |
2.91 |
| Lalitpur
|
86.5 |
389.6 |
12.2 |
0.67 |
Bhaktapur |
23.6 |
54.46 |
13.92 |
0.67 |
WHOGV |
105 |
50 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
Minimum
values of NH3, NO3, Fe and Mn found in Kathmandu,
Lalitpur and Bhaktapur are represented in
the table and graph as follows:
| |
NH3
(mg/L) |
NO3
(mg/L) |
Fe
(mg/L) |
Mn
(mg/L) |
Kathmandue |
0.01 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
Lalitpur |
0.05 |
0.14 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
Bhaktapur |
1.3 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.14 |
WHOGV |
1.5 |
50 |
0.3 |
0.1 |

Significance
of Ammonia, Nitrate, Iron and Manganese
in water
Iron is a common element present in minerals
and soil and hence most natural water contains
some dissolved iron. The guideline value
of Iron as recommended by WHO is 0.3mg/L.
The problems created by high iron concentrations
are mainly aesthetic. Clothes develop rust
stains when washed in water containing iron.
It also leads to corrosion of pipes, pumps
etc and may lead to the deposition of Ferric
hydroxide.
Ammonia
is an indicator of water pollution through
human activities and natural decay processes.
Sewage contains large amount of ammonia
due to bacterial decay of nitrogenous organic
wastes. Presence of ammonia in ground water
is mainly due to seepage of wastewater but
in case of deep ground water, it is due
to geological factors like quality clay
and so on. The guideline value of Ammonia
as recommended by WHO is 1.5mg/L. Higher
concentration of ammonia is harmful for
fish and other biota and even human beings.
The
most important source of Nitrate in water
is the biological oxidation of organic nitrogenous
substances, which come in sewage and industrial
wastes. Some of the major sources of Nitrate
in water are domestic sewage, fertilizers,
rainwater and manure. The guideline value
of Nitrate as recommended by WHO is 50mg/L.
Higher concentration of Nitrate in water
may cause death in infants by cyanosis.
Nitrate concentration higher than 200mg/L
increase the risk of stomach cancer.
The
guideline value of Manganese as recommended
by WHO is 0.1mg/L. At levels exceeding 0.15mg/L,
manganese in water supplies stains plumbing
fixtures and laundry. At 0.05mg/L, manganese
will often form a coating on pipes, which
may slough off as a black precipitate.
Conclusion
The
study shows that most of the ground water
in Kathmandu valley is contaminated with
Iron and Ammonia and to some extent Manganese
also. Presence of Iron and ammonia in high
concentration might have been due to geological
condition. It might have leached out from
the aquatic plants, which might have been
deposited during prehistoric times.
For
domestic consumption of water, most of the
water should be treated for the removal
of these parameters. Though the parameters
are only of aesthetic significance, it is
always better to treat them if they are
above WHO guideline value because excess
is always harmful.